Please address the comments from this code review:

## Individual Comments

### Comment 1
<location> `src/llama_stack_provider_ragas/remote/ragas_remote_eval.py:120` </location>
<code_context>
-            load_kube_config(client_configuration=config)
-            token = str(config.api_key["authorization"].split(" ")[-1])
+            kube_config = _load_kube_config()
+            token = str(kube_config.api_key["authorization"].split(" ")[-1])
         except ImportError as e:
             raise RagasEvaluationError(
</code_context>

<issue_to_address>
**issue (bug_risk):** Splitting the authorization header may be brittle if the format changes.

The code relies on a fixed 'Bearer <token>' format, which may not always be present. Please add validation or error handling to manage unexpected or missing formats.
</issue_to_address>

### Comment 2
<location> `src/llama_stack_provider_ragas/config.py:115-112` </location>
<code_context>
+        default=None,
+    )
+
+    kube_token: str | None = Field(
+        description=(
+            "Kubernetes token for Kubeflow pipeline execution. ",
+            "If not provided via env var, the token will be read from the local kubeconfig file.",
         ),
         default=None,
     )
</code_context>

<issue_to_address>
**nitpick:** The description field is a tuple, which may not render as intended.

Pydantic expects the description to be a single string. Please join the tuple elements into one string to ensure proper rendering.
</issue_to_address>

### Comment 3
<location> `src/llama_stack_provider_ragas/remote/kubeflow/utils.py:12-14` </location>
<code_context>
-    logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
-    logger.setLevel(logging.INFO)
-
-    try:
-        config.load_incluster_config()
-    except config.ConfigException:
</code_context>

<issue_to_address>
**suggestion (bug_risk):** Catching ConfigException without handling other exceptions may miss other errors.

Other exceptions, such as file not found or permission errors, may also occur when loading kubeconfig. Consider handling these cases to improve robustness.
</issue_to_address>